Skip to main content

Connecting Two Foundations.

In the last post I pointed out that we are doing the foundation pour in two parts in order to allow for  foam to be inserted between the two foundations.   According to my highly simplified calculations,  leaving the porch and house connected lead to a thermal bridge that can leak energy at a rate that is at least an order of magnitude bigger than using the foam and rebar.   The connection is still not 100% thermal bridge free but provides a decent option for connecting the two foundations and will also decrease the flow of energy between the two.  Inserting the foam did complicate things a little but John and the guys from Matchless Foundations didn't seem to care a whole lot about it.  They agreed that the two pours was the simplest way to do it.

Attaching the foam was relatively easy and took about an hour of work.  The procedure was as follows

1.  Cut foam to width of 8" to fit inside the wall form.
2.  Drill holes in the foam at a semi-regular spacing
3.  Snap a vertical chalk line on the exterior of the house foundation that represents the outside edge of the foam.
4.  Place the foam on the foundation and use a drill bit to mark the positions that need to be drilled.
5.  Drill, Drill, Drill....and Drill some 11 more times!
6.  Blow out the holes so the epoxy will adhere to the inside.
7.  Test rebar for fit.
8.  Fill holes about 3/4 full of epoxy.
9.  Insert Rebar slowly, squeezing epoxy out of the hole.  Scrape off the excess.
10.  Apply a good amount of foam compatible glue to the back of the foam.
11.  Fit rebar through he holes in the foam and push the foam tight agains the foundation while squeezing out the glue.
12.  Complete the same procedure for the other foundation connection.
13.  Continue forming the garage/porch foundation.

Done!

Will it be worth it?  Without modelling its hard to tell but given that it was such a low cost ($70 + 1 hour labour) it made sense to do it.







Comments

  1. Hi David,
    I am finding your blog very helpful as we build our "pretty good house" in New Hampshire.
    I am also planning to use a bond break for thermal reasons between the house and garage foundations. I am interested in finding out if there is some structural engineering analysis behind the approach you show. For instance, why 5 pieces of rebar, not 4 or 6?
    Thank you.
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi Mike, sorry for the late response.. This was a recommendation from an engineer!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wood Stove in a Passive House: Feeling Warm Already!

Who would have thought that putting a wood stove into a house could be so complicated!!!  I know I didn't.  It really started when we decided to put the wood stove more centralized in the home.  Running a chimney inside the building envelope is much more efficient than running it outside the thermal envelope from many perspectives.  The chimney will develop draft much more quickly if the chimney runs inside the envelope, and there is less thermal bridging to the outside. Have a look at the stove in question below, the Walltherm gasification boiler ( www.waltherm.ca ).  The picture below illustrates the back of the stove. It has a sealed combustion chamber with an air intake at the bottom that is ducted to the outside.  It is a closed combustion system.  This is a necessity in a passive house for several reasons 1.  Draft in the chimney requires air to be pulled into the stove.  In a super tight house, the draft necessary to keep the stove going will be hard to make up if

Building the Air Tight Barrier: Door Flashing Details.

It took us a while to wrap our heads around the door details on my plans.  The main exterior wall is composed of 2x8s.  The rough stud opening was substantially larger than the door.  Because the walls are much deeper than a standard door frame for a 2x6 wall, the interior of the 2x8 opening was studded with double 2x4s.   Outside of these 2x4s, there is 1.5" of foam and another 2x4 on face which brings the door frame opening flush to the exterior 3" of EPS foam.  The brick mould of the door will sit against the exterior of the wall.  The ganged 2x4s which define the opening will allow the door to open a little further than that of a 2x8 wall.    With the door details finalized, I had to flash the opening as per the plan.  I specified the size/shape for aluminum sill pans and CBS Eavestroughing made them for me.  The sill pans have a kind of end dam to prevent water from entering under the under the stud opening should the door ever leak. (Photo 1-1).   After verifying t

Introducing: The Flatrock Passive House

So...after 8 1/2 years in our home, we have decided to move on.  Well, not right away! We have quite a bit of planning ahead of us.  With the likely onset of a 233% hike in the cost of electricity from Muskrat Falls (when compared to todays rate of $0.0972/kWh) we decided it was time to take energy consumption seriously before its too late to do anything about it.  The land has been acquired, the planning has started!  I am planning on nipping my energy bill in the bud before it becomes a major sinkhole in my pocket book. Upon investigating current building standards, I realized that the Canadian Building Code is below the standards necessary to really make a difference in energy consumption.  There are some standards like R2000 which can make a difference to total energy usage.  A R-2000 home can use up to 50% less heating energy compared to a code built home; if built properly!  A blower door test will reveal the truth about that. Now....Imagine living in a home where you have em